How do you select a softswitch based on concurrent calls?

The short answer is—you don’t. It sounds kind of obvious: the more concurrent calls (or simultaneous calls), the better. But that‘s not the best metric for making such an important decision. So what is the concurrent calls metric good for? Well, it shows part of the performance of the softswitch. But you don‘t buy a car based only on its maximum speed, right?

Very fast car

You don‘t buy a car based only on its maximum speed, right?

In this article, we’ll analyze the concurrent calls metric and show its importance in selecting a softswitch.

How many concurrent calls can it handle?

This is the question we hear most often from people who are interested in starting a VoIP business or who want to change their current system. They ask the question to determine how “good” the softswitch is and use this basic metric to compare different solutions.

But first, it‘s important to determine what a call is from the softswitch perspective. As a connection between two parties, a call can mean different things when we start to measure softswitch performance.

We can simplify things and get down to three types of calls:

  • Signaling only (media goes directly between calling parties)
  • Media proxy without transcoding (same codec)
  • Media proxy with transcoding (different codecs)

From the softswitch perspective, the signaling-only type is the easiest part to handle, and media with transcoding is the hardest. That means a softswitch can handle a lot of calls with signaling only but not so many when calls are transcoded (i.e., when the calling parties are using different codecs).

But that‘s not the most complicated part of comparing softswitches.

As the “soft” part of softswitch suggests, the software is the main part in the solution and does all the heavy lifting. But software performance depends on hardware. Thus, in order to compare solutions properly, the hardware should be the same—which is hardly ever the case. This is another issue that prohibits direct comparison of various softswitches.

Other factors we should consider are traffic patterns: average success rate (ASR), average length of call, call success rate, etc. A system that processes traffic with a lower ASR will handle fewer concurrent calls than an identical system that handles traffic with a better ASR. Different business models have different traffic patterns, which greatly influences the performance of a softswitch.

Based on this information, we see that concurrent calls only show the call-processing performance of a softswitch. Actually, concurrent calls are not the best metric for measuring the “real” performance: instead, that‘s derived from the calls per second (CPS) metric, which is more suitable for performance measurement.

 

If you want to check how many concurrent calls can be handled in different test environments by the most popular softswitches on the market,  download this white paper. white_paper_cover_concurrent_calls_download

 

So concurrent calls aren’t important—should I check the CPS?

Yes and no. Concurrent calls and CPS values are important in selecting a softswitch, but they aren’t the only metrics on which you should base your long-term decision.

These metrics help you to know a solution’s limits and help you in planning your business.

Different business models have different performance needs. Wholesale traffic exchange, residential VoIP, business VoIP, calling cards, callback: all of these business models influence the requirements for the softswitch because of their different traffic patterns.

For example, a wholesale business requires the highest concurrent calls/CPS, and a business VoIP the lowest. So before deciding on the necessary concurrent calls, make sure you clearly understand the kind of business that will use the softswitch.

For a very basic, quick calculation, you can use this VoIP load calculator: http://www.voip-toolbox.com/calculator. It will help you understand the various parameters that influence concurrent calls/CPS based on your business model, so it simplifies the decision-making process.

Just as you don’t buy a car based only on its maximum speed, don’t select a softswitch based only on the concurrent calls/CPS metrics.

There are many other factors to base your decision on:

  • Price (initial/outgoing)
  • Functionality
  • Product/company reputation, their time in the market, etc.
  • Ease of use
  • Support options
  • Integration options
  • Customization options
  • What your partners/clients/suppliers use
  • …and many others (which we’ll cover in subsequent articles).

When comparing pure softswitch performance, take particular note of the call types, hardware, and traffic patterns that were used during the tests.

What do you think about the importance of concurrent calls in selecting a softswitch?

Please leave a comment, or contact us directly to continue the discussion!

Contact Us

2 Comments How do you select a softswitch based on concurrent calls?

  1. Kalyan

    Dear Mindaugas,

    This article is very informative. I have been in a dilemma for last few days about the platform to choose and proceed with. As you mentioned there are multiple factors that determine the performance. And for beginners with limited technological know-how, it is really important to understand what is important and what is not! But, market dynamics seem to instigate every other company (except Kolmisoft) to start offering service based on cc.

    Kalyan

    Reply
    1. Mindaugas Kezys

      Thank you for your comment Kalyan.

      People like to compare and people like simple things. It is the easiest way to compare softswitches by cc. You can start from this, but do not stop there. Take into account all the other factors up-front. Selecting the softswitch is long-term decision which will influence yours and your companie’s life a lot.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *